Insights July 2008

Bookmark and Share
July 27th, 2008 by Peter Yesawich

TURNING GREEN INTO GREEN

According to a recent national survey we conducted with the Travel Industry Association, almost nine out of ten American adults profess to be “environmentally conscious.” The majority manifest their environmental concern by turning off the lights when leaving a room, being energy efficient by regulating air conditioning/heating temperatures when not at home, and recycling and/or composting trash. These activities are mentioned by more than eight in ten Americans who claim to be “green.” Not surprisingly, however, there are significant gender differences in the behaviors exhibited by men versus women, with the latter generally more committed to environmentally safe practices. These are revealed in the table below.

Attitude/Behavior
Total
Men
Women
Environmentally Conscious
85
83
87
Turn off the lights when leaving the room
87
83
90
Be energy efficient at by regulating air conditioning/heating when not at home
85
80
89
Recycle and/or compost trash
82
79
84
Keep showers short
73
66
78
Read books/magazines or watch movies/videos about nature or the environment
67
65
69
Buy environmentally safe household products, even if they cost more
57
53
60
Use public transportation whenever possible
33
31
35
Car pool
31
25
36
Belong to environmental organizations such as World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, The Sierra Club
16
14
18
Drive a hybrid car
5
6
4
† Denotes statistically significant difference from men.

The question for most travel marketers, however, is whether or not concern about the environment represents a market opportunity. The answer is yes, although primarily with respect to market share, not incremental rates or yields. Specially, four out of ten leisure travelers “probably/definitely” would select an environmentally friendly travel supplier if they knew about the supplier’s commitment to the environment (not surprisingly, significantly more women than men agree with this statement). And although nearly one-half state they’re willing to pay higher fares/rates for the services provided by such suppliers, the majority (53%) state they are not. Among those willing to pay more, the overwhelming majority (six in ten) report they would pay only up to 9% more.

The conclusion is therefore clear: a travel service supplier’s commitment to and communication of environmental responsibility may be sufficient to shift market share. Consumers’ reluctance to pay more to support “green causes” suggests that most, however, view the demonstration of this responsibility as an obligation of businesses that should, arguably, be good stewards of the environment anyway.

For further information of the results of the Ypartnership/Yankelovich 2008 National Travel MONITORsm please click here.

4 Responses to “Insights July 2008”

  1. Chris Wilson Says:

    I wonder what this means for the major forms of transportation in travel.

    Does this mean that some consumers will be more likely to vacation closer to home or take a cruise leaving from nearby location versus flying on a large jet to a destination on the other side of the world?

    I think we will see a clear win with environmentally conscious travels when we can show clear differentiation in energy use from one trip vs. another. How about a travel site that does only this and rates vacation packages based on how environmentally friendly they are?

  2. Danielle Says:

    This advice is really going to help, thanks.

  3. Alejandro Says:

    VRy interesting to read it :P :D

  4. road trip Says:

    I don’t hang out at blogs much but I like yours. Thanks for the posts. I have enjoyed reading here.

Leave a Reply